Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 09.02.2010, 16:24 Язык оригинала: Русский       #4
Гуру
 
Аватар для Veronic
 
Регистрация: 17.12.2008
Адрес: Украина Мукачево, Венгрия Хевиз
Сообщений: 2,165
Спасибо: 1,793
Поблагодарили 1,718 раз(а) в 574 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 4
Репутация: 2879
Отправить сообщение для Veronic с помощью Skype™
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Meister Посмотреть сообщение
Enron - also in his time was supernadezhy companies, and Lehman Brothers was one of the most reliable banks in the world.

Not agree with you. There are a number of paintings whose authenticity can be podtvezhdena with 100%certainty, but when buying a modern artist no problem at all can not be. BUT! buying a contemporary artist (even the already successful), there is generally no guarantee that it will rise in price. NO! Hirst and Koons won has sunk to 50%. Investments in the art tested by time. Moreover, investing in antiques are possible from $ 1000, so it's not such big amount and period of investment may be less than a year.
100%chance of authenticity once again I repeat can not give anything, if the artist did not say "Yes, it's my job, but on antiques that can not be done, as you can imagine. A lot of pictures that were already in museums later identified as a forgery, or school .....
And the fact that the thing will grow in value and there are no guarantees on antiques, it's like a lottery or securities, or perhaps real estate, something to gain and something to lose, and in the future and can be swapped several times (всмысле win-lose) .



Veronic вне форума   Ответить с цитированием