Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 08.02.2010, 18:52 Язык оригинала: Русский       #138
Гуру
 
Регистрация: 15.09.2009
Адрес: Киев
Сообщений: 3,066
Спасибо: 385
Поблагодарили 3,134 раз(а) в 1,448 сообщениях
Репутация: 6243
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от LCR Посмотреть сообщение
is still the artists who made their way without galleries. But the galleries, which would exist without the artists, can not be, by definition, right? This is the question of who is more important
Цитата:
Сообщение от L-ana64110 Посмотреть сообщение
What can make a gallery owner that can not make an artist.
 Owners of galleries working with already prepared material, without the pain or the training of the artist or his material,,,,
Without gallerist thin-ku can live, but that would make gal-art without the artist? Trading onions at the market .
  There are people who try without the banks, but banks, which would exist without people, can not be. This is Aporia (relative sophism) - fictional, logically true, the situation (the statement), which can not exist in reality. LCR has used or sophistry, or in determining who is more important, but we know that the "main" banks.
 Traders onions also work with already prepared material. Koreans grow it better, but other traders in the bazaar onion-more-this is - a paradox.
  Only in real life triumphant orthodoxy (the antonym of paradox) - curse, curse gallerist not all the same to him come and find out who the main.
 Otlichnye logic games.



Fed вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 4 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо Fed за это полезное сообщение:
AlexanderG (18.01.2011), artcol (08.02.2010), LCR (08.02.2010), Ninni (08.02.2010)