Цитата:
Сообщение от AlexanderG
Ne vizu osoboi problemy. Raboty hvatit na all those feeds from this field.
|
Your vision
AlexanderG, here you are a gallery owner.
You really do not know, or just want to I read?
The only
objective criterion of any professional is the fact that people are often referred to as vague word - "time". In fact, nothing obscure here. "Time" -
is the sum of the views prevailing in the professional community for a certain period of time. And the more this interval, the objective assessment of labor rights. Here are relevant only to the views of professionals. If Renoir called Vermeer's giant, then 100 000 AleksandrovG this assessment will not change. Or how Korovin, wrote: "One angry young man said:" I do not like Titian. " "He has not become worse" - I replied. "
This applies to almost any profession. For example, we have almost every major city in Russia has a hospital named after Pirogov. Who is the cake? Well - the doctor, well - a surgeon. That's all that he knows a simple man. Why his name is given to the hospital? that he committed such? Maybe it's the janitors, the astronauts or artists hurry up? "Come on, say, perpetuating, he said, jaundice invented ... not he? Botkin? But what difference ...»
Opinion dealers, curators, art historians, critics, gallery owners, etc. - again, if not more, because they are too short-lived. The question is: how to evaluate a professional artist or not? My answer is: about the same as estimated professional doctor. Only with the artists easier because the penny-a work of the doctor hides the earth, and the artist's trash is visible for a long time
.
And. If I need to be consulted on artbiznesa, I turn to you, and not to the great "Pablo" Tyryshkina. Guess - why?