[ulysses]

Very good comment Uta Kilter about the exhibition and "kontemporeri art":

I'm sorry, but this is not modern, not actual, not modern art! The same work Chichkan that shocked the entire town of Pushkin as a chimpanzee, she cries out: 'I told you there kichuhu painted in what you both need! You deserve only her! ". And how sad we had a meeting at the end of the year with the authors of the exhibition "Nova hvilya" at the National Art Museum of Ukraine, almost like on Dumas - Twenty Years Later "! Artists have become somewhat grizzled, slightly smorschinivshimisya, but they have the same emotions. We started together with Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, but they are already in Europe, and we are all there in the "scoops", with "scoop". And when someone used the worn-out wisdom of that, they say, God forbid, live in times of change, I snarled (this word is in Russian?) Was asked: "Change? What change? Where? In what? "Because there were able to arrange so that a full-fledged Europeans, that the same means Soros created these centers of contemporary art ...

And of those who started the "Novo hvilyu, only a handful survived, all went into commercial art, which they have themselves identified as" kontemporeri art (and writing), which is neither modern nor relevant, nor the latest call impossible. So, drawn again malyunki of yellow journals. And their creators for anything in the soul does not ache, and they live on Mars, and the Ukraine and all of us, they spit, they would only order food for their produce. They "eat with art. What is superbly demonstrated RESTART exhibition at the Naval Station. Very, very sorry, because Mr. Dymchuk obviously invested considerable funds, wanting to provide that, in his opinion, his personal opinion, is the modern art of Ukraine, but it was a "kontemporeri" what he knew, but did not realize ...

I am still (and why only me?) All around the tortured, asked: "Are these filled with anecdotes of painting of the yellow journals and is the contemporary art of Ukraine?". I answered: "Yes, but -" kontemporeri! Except Pavel Makov. Strikingly different: young authors do not distinguish between forty-fifty-year, they have all at once, initially, on subsistence-pleasing nouveaux riches are baked. That is something this expensive project was not good - presentation was to introduce it, but said the exhibition was not addressed either the mind or heart. Only the stomach but genital (the creators), derision. Llp ...

http://timer.od.ua/?p=56486