Цитата:
Сообщение от Вивьен
Сразу вспомнила лекции по политэкономике 
Всеобщая формула Капитала Маркса: Д-Т- Д’,
Na eto i byl rasschiot! 
где Д - деньги, Т - товар, Д' - сумма денег с приращением.
Чтобы просто деньги превратились в деньги с приращением - необходимо промежуточное Т.
В данном случае Т - это товар - рабочая сила. В нашем случае Т - это труд художника. |
Po Marksu eto ne sovsem rabotaet.
I, kstati, T eto kombinatsiia truda hudoznika i prodavtsa.
A vot i paradoks Marksa. Ia ego ispol'zoval v svoei dissertatsii. Perevodit' seichas ne budu - hochu spat', u nas pozdno.
According to Marx: "A commodity is, in the first place, an object outside us, a thing that by its properties satisfies human wants of some sort or another" (Marx, 1867), in this way fine art perfectly qualifies as a commodity in that it satisfies human wants.
However Marx contradicts himself by saying: "... nothing can have value, without being an object of utility. If the thing is useless, so is the labour contained in it; the labour does not count as labour, and therefore creates no value" (Marx, 1867). Fine art, unless a painting is covering hole in the wall, is not a utilitarian object in practical terms. Consequently art and the artist's labour must cost nothing.