In principle, I think you're both right. Man creates the environment itself - is correct. Imagine that you have decided, under any circumstances to have dealings with scoundrels. After some time, they begin to avoid you, because there's nothing to catch. At the same time, decent people will begin to reach out to you, because they will know that rogues near you None. Now imagine that you're building high-quality paintings, and waive any junk, even if it promises a profit. You will no longer offer junk and will offer tolko the quality that you need. Will get, as if "things you find yourself." If I do not write landscapes, no one will come to order me a landscape.
Цитата:
|
If he is an artist, he did not have anyone
|
This, of course, correct. But the dealer also owed nothing to anybody. But one and the other is useful to know whether they have any common ground. Perhaps they will find a common language and will cooperate. Or maybe not ...
Цитата:
|
For them to be courageous, much more important than being happy.
|
And maybe be brave - too happy? or doing things you love life?
As I understand it, if the artist is unknown, only sold directly to the public, the work he is not enough, dealers he is not interested? Even if the work like?