Thank you for criticism, but ...
You are mistaken in the fact that our base is not beyond Artprice and Artnet.
For example in a database of about 3000 Artprice Russian artists, and in our larger 5000.
This is, in your opinion, does not go?
There are no data with the results of auctions of the CIS countries, as we have.
For example:
Nalbandian: on artprayse - 37 auction records (the sum of the three spellings of the names Nalbandian, so that in reality, maybe less), we have 76 of his works.
Gerasimov: at artprayse 6 auction records, and we have 114 works.
And there's a difference: we have if the work was sold several times, then our database will be given a job with a few sales, but on how artprayse will appear on a separate sale of various works.
Цитата:
|
Quite often there are discrepancies in the biographical data of little-known artists.
|
Concerning the inaccuracies in the biographies of lesser-known artists.
We have the largest database of Russian artists in the world and, unfortunately, we have simply not had time to re-examine all available information on biographies, but this work and is quite intense. This work is very time-consuming, and we would have been very grateful for their help in refining the data. By the way, some forum users have to actively help us in this, so if you provide us with the inaccuracies, it would be useful to all, especially as the biographies are in the public domain.
Цитата:
|
Surprisingly the presence of an indicator of investment risk in yellow, against the artist's work, which site has no information
|
About the indicators of investment risk is described in detail here
http://artinvestment.ru/about/risk_indicator/
Sami icons are arranged by experts and they are listed with us here
http://artinvestment.ru/about/council/
Biographies and indicators of investment risk involved in different people, therefore, not surprising when the judge knows the art and the artist's works, and therefore poses a particular indicator, and biography are not properly prepared.