Цитата:
Сообщение от LCR
This is - as on the exchange: that conservative investment is aimed at preservation of capital (an example - real estate, which does not bring in income, but protects the capital). In the art market is mainly the work of old masters: it is difficult to speculate on them, as well as abrupt changes in price are very rare (perhaps only surprise with attribution), but the price for them is constantly increasing with the accuracy of the pendulum.
Speculation - buying in order to quickly sell a substantial profit (personally, I'm in speculation on the art market, given its low liquidity and extremely high costs, do not believe).
Agree to buy the Rembrandt etching or drawing Delacroix less risky than Schnabel painting or sculpture, Koons?
In my opinion, Konstantin rights: it is easier to untwist direction than the individual artist. Look, do not accidentally say about Italian Transavantgarde, artists San Francisco Bay, London, the Leipzig school, young English artist. Even when the artistic direction, so to speak, "stated," some names are out ahead, others remain in the shadows ...
|
Liana, then we obtain a substitution of concepts: investment - investment in order to multiply the means. And in the case of conservative investments we are actually talking about
preservation,
preservation (with, and real estate (more), and art (to a lesser extent) are inherent in the cost of ownership, and sometimes small)
extra money to e-nowhere to attach.
With regard to speculative investments: if there is a wave, you can hurry up and catch. Such a moment was up to 2004 with socialist realism. But we must understand that such things always have and will.
As to the "direction or the artist: it is looking to more - the direction or the artist. Artist Roginskii I do not assotsiruetsya with some direction
