Цитата:
Сообщение от ecc4
I'm a little know how and what applies to the issuance of opinions on the works and I doubt that this is the case as you described. Is that what a secondary, third-rate institution ...
|
I also have some information about what happened in the issuance of opinions on the works, and I'm sure that the story passer equal validity.
About a year ago, a dealer brought a picture, allegedly written by Roginskii (it was not even a forgery, but simply the product of an unknown artist to me, stylistically absolutely nothing to do with not having Roginskii) at most that of a primary agency, and quite vysokostavlenny employee /ca this agencies immediately put kindly /and his signature to such attribution. In contrast to the stories told by passers-by, this /j Officer /Qi no doubt, which would prompt him /her to turn to the successor, that is, to me - it is possible that s /he decided to /and that the phone call on France will be too nakladen for an institution which s /he represents, or did not know /but you call in Paris, or he /she were there any considerations - this aspect of history unknown to me.
Fortunately, our dealer holds more than questionable Roginsky, apparently driven by the principle of "oatmeal butter will not spoil", he turned to another /nd Officer /tse of the same primary institution who /nd refused /Eh attributed to this work and asked Roginsky /Eh to me.