Again, "Sellers vacuum." (By M. Kantor)
-------------------------------------------------- --------
Maxim Kantor :".... so-called relevant art for the modern middle class, completed the process. Now everyone can be an artist, anyone can become a consumer of art, and the cost of the product consists of the turnover of common interests. The new middle class wants the brightest symbols of freedom so as passionately as they once Dutch burgher - a still life of ham, and the French rentier - a landscape with a broom. Give us a canvas with stripes and freedom-installation - we will put it in a new apartment, and our friends will know what we are progressive people.
Bourgeois need to told him that he is great and free, and know what is freedom, or that somewhere there are slaves, he is not necessarily ... "
Read more:
http://www.expert.ru/printissues/exp...davcy_vakuuma/
-------------------------------------------------- --------------
Цитата:
Сообщение от Pavel
The American wrote about Kandinsky, of Pollock, the museum Gugenheyma.Kandinsky great painter, Pollock was a great painter. Museum has collected fine art, where there is political vomit named Kandinsky Prize and contemporary art. In my opinion these are two big differences. This is generally two different things.
I would call this premium sponsor's name, as it there prize Shalva.
|
Here I agree with you, make a fool people ... Bozena about the same thing and wrote.