Цитата:
Сообщение от SAH
Romario, Oh You can guess that at that time the deficit was unlikely to sell leather embossed
At the time, like the oligarchs did not exist, people jailed for speculation and all the major cash flows were under the state.
|
Then have the party, cinematographers, entertainer type Furtseva, Rostropovich, etc. and it is a nobody planted. Everything flows, everything changes. Then they, and now other.
A Rzhevskij they both then and now, and generally out of time!
Added after 4 minutes
Цитата:
Сообщение от Decaux
A question on a discussion, they were rich or poor. Rockefeller also was not being consumed in fur coats and cars. In general, he went on foot, because the petrol expensive. From the memoirs of his daughter - she remembered that everyone was talking about their bessmetnyh riches, and she never saw any cash or checks, or expensive clothes or jewelry - nothing. Asceticism was terrible. Slept on kkih some iron beds.
I think it would be correct to say that they are all rich, only one preferred to prosper in his - that the Rockefeller Foundation plant, then for the collector - a picture. And the same passion, and the same forward movement.
On the same basis we can and Rockefeller to name the poor - the benefits of civilization, he did not enjoy, he lived accumulation kapitalla.
|
I totally agree.