[Vladimir]

Looked the recently opened exhibition hall of the latest trends in the Tretyakov Gallery on the Crimean shaft. Feelings mixed. Of course, great, that contemporary art has finally appeared in the main museum of the country. A good selection of things, and just good that the process goes. There are, however, their costs. Tretyakov very conservative and presents only those authors for whom there is historical consensus on the recognition of their contribution. Therefore 80%of the exhibition - is the essence of the eighties and sixties. Makarevich, Kosolapov, Orlov, Roginsky, Kabakov ... It is understandable that visitors expect to see the actual art, the past 15 years. Even "fly agarics" with "medgermenevtikoy" is no longer debating material. It's already in the textbooks. " But really that much good Kabakov - its value has long been recognized.
Tretyakov cautious. It turned out that in this exposition in the upper part of the name of courage - it Kulik with Osmolovsky, Avdei Ter-Oganyan with Koshlyakov, but with Sigutinym, and Shutov with Ostretsova. Overall - good. But could be more cheerful.
  
And, at least for investors, has become clearer guidance. Once Tretyakovka really shook up, then what is it? Curator of modern art Musefication exactly will work easier.
Vladimir Bogdanov