[Евгений]

Сообщение от Tjutchev

Despite the expertise Hoffman and Lomize, I can not make myself believe that this work Saryan.

 

Сообщение от Samvel

Dear Alenka, except for chem. analysis, there are many wonderful things (factors) on examination of paintings by M. Saryan, which is not you, not "Assi" on a fake not vkurse. I want one of these secrets to reveal, to the master of fake pictures too did not work. The fact that Martiros s1907 to 1914 led the notebook-diary detailing all their zapisoval sold and donated works, so that no new unknown paintings of this period, when they appear not one himself a respected expert not confirmed.
P.S. You exhibited works, among saryanovskih falshakov can zanemat high places

Given the information the distinguished collector Samvel O., we can assume that this work with great probability, is also a fake works of M. Saryan ...
-------------------------------------------------- -------

Читать дальше... 

Сообщение от Tjutchev

Lomize,

On the "expertise" I. Lomize written and more than once:
".... Also in the catalog (Catalog fakes ,1-4 volume) carried an interview of one of the biggest collectors in Russia, Alfa Bank president Pyotr Aven, which he gave the publisher of the directory also collector Vladimir Roshchin. The essence of his in the literal and sharp indictment Russian experts and Russian antiquities market in the uncleanliness and corruption. "I believe that we should not hesitate to name names - says Peter Aven, - Here are the experts GTG Valyaeva or Lomize. They are very few people trust ......"
http://www.kommersant.ru/doc.aspx?Do...6&ThemesID=183
----------------------------------------------
Here's another fake with the "expertise" I. Lomize

Сообщение от Oleg Nazarov

That's a fake Saryan with original papers from the State Tretyakov Gallery .... signature too real .... weak odd job, can be seen as zastaren canvas etc. ...
I saw her in the 2008m, but probably now somewhere wandering hand