Цитата:
Сообщение от mihailovoh
A signature is not the appropriate application of the author and is poddelka.sovremenaya net.dazhe it or when the work performed by students.
I have long exactly this question interisoval-whether my work kleverkov * * with the native signature S Klever be considered authentic. (Although on luxury provenans.ekspertizy GTG.Grabarya)
Naverno.kto thrill and for his Ayvazovski?
|
Цитата:
Сообщение от mihailovoh
In ekpertizah ukazano.chto work performed W clover and students. signature matches the reference. I incidentally. gave a list of known works M.V.Obolenskogo.tam is not a job. he performed the work in the studio of clover in the early 20th
|
Here I do not quite understand your question. In my opinion, everything is clear, your pictures are among the authorship of which is defined as "studio Clever. If the expert believes that this is so, and he must write. Of course, the expert may be mistaken, but that is another question ...
That Clover puts his signature on the work of his students, it is well-known fact! The first 15 years of his career (roughly until the mid 80's.) He was very much in demand artist. His popularity rivaled in popularity Shishkin. Sam Clover lived in a big way. And, as you know, good enough does not happen! Yes, and he was a man of great soul, to lend money to, not demanding repayment. In a word - Hussar! I think that is what played a cruel joke with a talented painter. This way of life demanded more and more new spending, but there is humanly possible, and the time is not rubber. Then came perhaps his idea to sign the work of his students, giving them their own. Having done this once or twice, he could not stop. Moreover, he has always been justified by the fact that such a practice until it has occurred in Western Europe.
Period when Clover allowed himself to sign someone else's work, is about the middle of his creative work (the mid 80's - 90-e gg.). Also this time and creative decline Julia Yul'evich. Together, plus a huge number of imitators, whose works are sometimes issued for the work of clover, and served as the perception of clover as a weak artist, and even trivial, which of course is not true! Sam Clover realize their own creative bankruptcy of his period, and publicly admitted that it published (I think in the early 900-x) in the distribution of the St. Petersburg newspaper "more full and frank confession article entitled" Confessions of Julia Clever. He wrote: "I worked quickly and ... a lot of stops to explore the nature, use prepared impressions and wrote one after another their" kleverovskie "pictures with winter ash-pink sunset, and horned trees ..."
Of course, Julius Yulievich created many problems for the living fans of his work. And this means that part and its responsibility for the confusion that has arisen around his work. But as they say, "the fact and pike to carp was not asleep ..."