Цитата:
Сообщение от SergeiSK
dedulya37,
More. With my picture is a fake, I spoke about this. You kept it in the hands or on photo define forgery? For this even well-known art critics are not taken. I just honestly expressed my opinion and you got me the same reproach. I also did not further develop the theme that not all the pictures Stozharov defined you as forgery, are fakes. Some of them have expertise GTG. And you have them in a fake right away, and even publish them here. Perhaps due to the fact that you did not come to determine the authenticity and do not pay for this?
I was not even filmed it! Let all who wish to pass on this link and tell - what they subversive? All the best traditions of the same Gelos - "authorship presumably for signature.
Whole dialogue with you is considered closed. I probably could have, at your request not only to remove, and even destroy the work, not poorer for it, but you got me on the same is not requested. But now she will hang on the Hammers until the end of the century, until the occasion arises, I will not give it to the professional expertise and already then he'll decide what to do with it. And you can complain to me least in the interplanetary court.
You this speech just put yourself in the strange situation, because now I'll be all the holders Stozharov advise not to go to you, and in other places.
Either you bring me here apologize, or do and continue to struggle with the wind power mills. No apology dialogue and compromise will not be!
|
You must forgive me, I probably something I do not understand. Many here at the forum, spoke about the abundance of fakes and indignant. I think you also took part in this debate.
And now it turns out that all this time, at least one picture, which you yourself have said that it was fake, was put up for auction you?
You know, just now I had planned a similar story about one of the 3 Roginsky artworks offered for auction by Shapiro (in my opinion, I found out about it here on the forum, it is up to you?). First I talked to himself Shapiro, who was very polite, then he gave the coordinates of the owner of my work. He called me 2 times - when the first conversation he was very polite and promised to withdraw the work from the auction. Call me a second time, he talked to me a somewhat different tone and also hinted at money for due diligence and to my "wish to declare this fake job. Today, I am not sure that the work will be withdrawn from the auction.
What does this mean? As soon as the successor of the artist say that a picture of non-genuine, they (us) immediately suspected some mercantile or Jesuit considerations. See, you can even demand that you apologized, but apologies for what?
And what could be the reasons? It is primarily an artist (yes, if the artists did not, you and many others on this forum would find himself some other way of earning money to live on), and forged the name of the stain and distort his work, undermine its reputation. I do not know whether you thought about it someday, but for many of the artist's heirs is important, indeed, it is important to * only * this, and certainly not any money for the examination (which I, incidentally, do not ask and do not get ).
You think about the paintings, as a commodity - this is required by your profession. But any counterfeit goods be destroyed, why the picture should be an exception?
Sergey, I beg of you, remove the work at auction. Make the examination and if she will confirm the authenticity of the picture, then you have to sell it, and if not, destroy it, the life of this will be a little more bearable.