Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 20.10.2008, 16:35 Язык оригинала: Русский       #44
Гуру
 
Аватар для LCR
 
Регистрация: 29.04.2008
Адрес: Париж
Сообщений: 6,211
Спасибо: 18,677
Поблагодарили 38,263 раз(а) в 5,446 сообщениях
Репутация: 29883
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Meister Посмотреть сообщение
willing to bet that the cost of graphics impressionists, expressionists, Fauvism, bubnovalettsev, Russian avant-garde of the sixties is less than the cost of their paintings. I think the examples here are superfluous?

Hitryuga Master quoted in the main direction, graphic artists are doing little or not doing.
You can imagine Malevich, which makes the preparatory sketches from nature for his black square?

But Schiele drawings, for example, are not much cheaper than his own painting (the exact data I do not, look for sloth).
I do not know the price of drawings Sveshnikov, but in all fairness they should cost much more than his own painting.

Now about the restoration. I now click on "no opinion", because it all depends on the subject (and on the restoration). That is, if I was, for example, Raphael in very bad condition, I would not hesitate for one second and showed it to restore * *.
On the other hand, say, fell off a butterfly wing from some dick (CT) barn or tail of kunsovskogo rabbit, where the problem? stick it, and that's that!

That is, I want to say, collectors prefer to buy the work before the restoration, and they are right. Man is more or less random, of course, buy now only "commodity" form.



LCR вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 3 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо LCR за это полезное сообщение:
K-Maler (04.03.2009), qwerty (20.10.2008), Евгений (20.10.2008)