Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 20.10.2008, 15:45 Язык оригинала: Русский       #42
Гуру
 
Аватар для artcol
 
Регистрация: 13.09.2008
Сообщений: 12,073
Спасибо: 6,205
Поблагодарили 6,552 раз(а) в 3,043 сообщениях
Репутация: 12904
Отправить сообщение для artcol с помощью Skype™
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Meister Посмотреть сообщение
artcol, most of the artist are also graphs. Well, you also will not deny that painting is cheaper graphics? As for the demand you are absolutely right, but the cheaper thing, so it is available. And, thanks to the chart, the house may appear well-known names as oil Goncharova, for example, can buy the favorites, but the graphics (eg, theatrical costumes) much more accessible rest.
Retorted: in the process of creating works of art (PI), the artist creates a lot of rough and preparatory material, the first is always cheaper than a complete UI. And for painting preparatory material will be mainly be a painting (except for figure mb) ... etc.
No figures can argue ad infinitum ...
For the silver century agree with your assertion, but otherwise - will convince only numbers.
By the way the ratio of graphics and painting can be seen on this site as a result of trades, and art prices.



artcol вне форума   Ответить с цитированием