Цитата:
Сообщение от Seriy
"impressionist-neimpressionist" I define a very simple - if a sheet of white paper in the painting the artist wrote whiting and gray paint is not an impressionist, if the pink, blue, lilac, green, ocher and indigo, and white and black Do not use - the impressionist.
|
In principle, the approach is somewhat simplistic, but correct. I would not use the word "Impressionism", because white is not white written long before its emergence. I would say this: if a white says a black and white, this decorative painting, if a white says a combination of color shades, it Wahlern painting. All Ancient, Middle Ages and early Renaissance - is a pure decorative features of Art. With the invention of oil painting, Valerie took the lead, almost destroying the decorative features of Art. Impressionism - a color Valerie. For example, Cezanne did not recognize the decorative painting, and said that painting, without tonal transitions - not painting, but not the artist Gauguin. But the XX century decorative features of Art returned a lost right. However, the Soviet authorities, he was treated very cautiously, he was associated with modernism, avant-garde. West. Therefore, training in the Soviet academies and schools were built only on the principles Wahlern painting. These principles nurtured generations of artists. Nothing wrong with that, but there is some bias. Decorative painting is very small. Population perceives it as something very simplistic or exotic. But that is another topic.