Цитата:
Сообщение от ranzher
In anthropology, the term refers to people - the creator of tools, in contrast to homo sapience , a reasonable man.
|
That's right, not only in anthropology but in philosophy - see "The creative evolution" of Bergson, where he wrote:
"With regard to the human mind, the fact that the invention of mechanical devices has been and remains its main feature is clearly underestimated. /.../
If we were in its definition of human nature held only that history and prehistory of humankind, we, as a fundamental characteristic of human rights and the human mind, we would have to use an expression of Homo faber, rather than Homo sapiens ".
It is also used in sociology - see "Homo ludens, an essay about the social role of the game" Johan Hyuitsinga, adding contrast Homo sapiens (man, capable of abstract thinking) /Homo faber (man capable of inventing mechanical devices), the third characteristic - Homo ludens (the person who can leave their real lives through the game).
P.S. Translation mine and as you know, quickly. In general, no complaints - not from my side, not with yours, OK?
