Цитата:
Сообщение от Tjutchev
Do you think that greater impact on price in this case: the name of the owner or the quality of the work? Or perhaps the name of the designer
|
Collecting and the concept of brand inseparable and always has been. Buying a piece of art you are primarily paying for the name-brand. The more developed human society becomes, the more money works of art depends on the untwisted brand. This is primarily determined by the expansion of information space and on this basis, the emergence of new technologies unwinding name. Compare the features in this regard the Middle Ages and today. Collector always interested in the view of the surrounding society of its acquisitions, and in this regard, he primarily pays for the name. In prikladuhe concept of quality starts to play a more clear role, as compared with fine art, but still, it does not determine the price. In prikladuhe is ceteris paribus greater role played by the circulation thing. Again, this is connected with the subconscious, rather than with objective criteria - pay for something that is just me and Saint-Laurent, much less for the quality.
Clear example inspired Cyril with prices sovfarfor 50-x. Sranvnite price for such a thing with the stigma and without stigma - not the distance, and the abyss. Pay for the stamp - what is quality.
In the example of the fine arts - known to young passion, a student-diplomnitsa asked Nicholas Glushchenko write two things for the defense. Outcome - for one set of three, and the second generally not accepted. Such examples mass.