Цитата:
Сообщение от LCR
The report from the Fed --
I do not understand the subject matter of the two sides. If the trader bought the work because of how much he sold it did not matter the artist.
LCR-not true now - dealing with: the sale to the merchant must pay the artist the right to succeed.
|
Nevertheless, the resale value of work did not cause the artist. Yes, and droit de force is not everywhere.
Цитата:
Сообщение от LCR
gallery owner has no right "to violate the percentage mark-up on the work undertaken to implement. Romario rights, final prices should be monitored.
|
Who will supervise them in reality at the time of sale? Although this is not right to change the%, but if the job appears to hang because of this, and sold, then the hypothetical pritenzii look a bit fantastic.
Цитата:
Сообщение от LCR
What is the receipt? And what do you with a receipt that going to do? Wake up, Fed!
|
Rogues have always been. To do this, and take a receipt. But this is a topic about rogues, and gallery owners here asked why they are called artists (disliked), dealers, gallery owners and do not call them dauber.
Pritenzy, I actually can not be. Unless of course one another something is not pulled, but it is a mutual problem.