Цитата:
Сообщение от AlexanderG
Voznik vopros: Esli hudoznik utverzdaet, chto on ne mozet ne pisat, i vsia zizn 'u nego v etom, pochemu on schitaet, chto kto-to za eto dolzen platit'?
|
Here arises the answer is simple - no one owed nothing to anybody. Until and unless people come into the system of contractual obligations. And this applies not only to the gallery and the artist, but also an actor and theater, writer and publisher ....
The artist can work quietly in the studio and create, in the hope that it works in the future will occupy a worthy place in world history of art. And perhaps this will happen ... But if an artist wants to be recognition in his lifetime, he would still have to reckon with the surroundings, and plunge into the world of complex relationships, where everyone takes their relying place. And not always (and in the beginning of the road and very rarely) the first artist to play ...
Not think it possible in their work to interfere in the creative process, which occupied the artist in his quest, experiments ... Of course, there are certain nuances in the contract works, but here, the main underlining is a professional author. Professionalism galereista often manifests itself in subtle maneuvering between the desires of the customer (buyer) and the vision of the artist, giving the desired result. But, I am deeply convinced that the artist, too, may not specify how to work galereistu. After the result of both - a work created by the author, and liked zakzchiku Bartered galereistom for staging all costs. Which grows on the market, reflecting the relevance of this artist ...