Цитата:
Сообщение от Mihail
Something is revered too. The more you study, the more ambiguity.
Lamentation someone once attributed Vrubel, it is clear to me, and everywhere now it is repeated. But Nesterov did not think of nem.No glavnyi remains that in the Holy Spirit at the time and in other paintings of the same church Vrubel recognizable in Lamentation categorically no, why? Let's restoration, but it requires updating of the old, but the sketch something new. Sketch this in no way coincides with any work Vrubel the time, Which is - nonsense turns ... It remains one and the sketch and painting carried out by someone else, probably someone from the school teachers Murashko.
|
Sorry that the Lord not be in your discussions, zasnul.Prezhde all, many thanks to Sergey for the material, which for me personally a lot proyasnyaet.U me, like many of you have also been called into question-hand-Wrubel, now, work at least for myself, I can Set a definite conclusion, Mikhail Aleksandrovich, in this case, followed the style of nearby preserved frescoes [based on photos sent Sergei]. This sketch, in any case, should have been someone that utverzhdatsya, and therefore was podpisan.A pairing official documents that over this fresco in St. Cyril's Cathedral worked exactly Vrubel, I think [pardon] is not in our kompetentsii.V any case, thanks to all participants disskusii.