Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 09.10.2008, 15:06 Язык оригинала: Русский       #1
Гуру
 
Аватар для Vladimir
 
Регистрация: 20.03.2008
Сообщений: 8,085
Спасибо: 3,353
Поблагодарили 25,446 раз(а) в 5,540 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 250
Репутация: 23527
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от artcol Посмотреть сообщение
There is a book "Investing in Art" (the name can not remember exactly, sponsored the Deutsche Bank), there was an attempt to bring the scientific basis for this case. Read - there all chewed.
Sergei Skaterschikova book, which attempts to Formula analysis of investment in art. I read. It is useful to the general point of view. But IMHO, many things are far-fetched, subjective time is not taken into account, a mathematician. Audience - brokers and white-collar workers, who had heard that in the art can be cool to invest. Here is the book http://www.skatepress.com/, released only in Russian.

[color="# 666686"]Added a 42 seconds[/color]
Цитата:
Сообщение от artcol Посмотреть сообщение
There is only one correct way to choose the artist (in terms of investment) - assessment of its contribution to the history of art. This is in spite of subjectivity - the most objective criterion of objectivity that recognizes the broadest possible range PROFESSIONALS, not involved in the art business (art historians, critics, etc.).
But with this statement completely agree.



Vladimir вне форума   Ответить с цитированием