23.11.2009, 15:53
|
Язык оригинала: Русский
#46
|
|
Гуру
Регистрация: 13.02.2009
Сообщений: 7,384
Спасибо: 3,976
Поблагодарили 4,028 раз(а) в 1,687 сообщениях
Репутация: -2
|
Цитата:
Сообщение от Veronic
Paul, there are artists who make duplicates of his paintings, but there is, who do not. And this fact has had virtually no impact on the value of the paintings, as did many artists and it has no effect on anything. Replays were there and will be. In our time, if the buyer does not want the artist once again repeated his work, then you have to pay both for exclusive and supported by an all contracts, so this is done by jewelers and fashion designers.
Replay also will be made by the artist, if the work is not entirely successful from the standpoint of the author and he no longer wants to return to this subject.
A repetition artists of the past no longer destroyed, so will have to accept. Although I do not think that the London Museum laments the fact that the same work of Leonardo is in the Louvre.
|
Any good artist exclusive precisely because the work is a means of capital investment and it must be expensive as a rarity. With a large number of repetitions is impaired artist
Rembrandt in America more
|
|
|