Цитата:
Сообщение от ranzher
When the world, and this, presumably, you mean the community of nations recognizes the art of a particular nation, then buys the product of this nation and puts them in their main national museums. And those buying in larger quantities than the significant contribution of this art in the world's treasury.
Try to vskidku examples of Russian models "Mount Olympus" in major European museums.
I can tell from France. In the Louvre, until recently, a permanent exhibition - 5. Now, it seems, already 4, was removed Aivazovsky, plus 17 icons.
In Orsay - 5, all of which exclusively presents. I must say thank you for accepting. Not always such an honor is.
Add Florence, Uffizi - one painting.
|
Ranzher, I've just noticed: but you do not shudder manenko?
Given some of the features of the chronology of the development of Russian art, not whether it would be more correct to refer to the permanent collection of the Pompidou Center, or the Tate Museum of Modern Art in New York?
At that time the situation will look different: even if you leave the Germans with Kandinsky Jawlensky - about Rothko, Soutine, de Stael, Polyakova, I do not even hinted at - Malevich, Goncharova, Larionov (the last two decades has been in storerooms), Exter, well and so on, everyone knows these names.
And I propose to do it differently: not only bring all these Rothko, Kossoff and other Alechinsky in place (in the list!), But also co-opt him artists of Russia bonds of kinship, so to speak, Russian par alliance. As you my idea? This will be a list - a list of all lists - and you Picasso, and Matisse, and Dali, and Leger and de Chirico ...