Цитата:
Сообщение от Pavel
critics-men of science, and science is the exact thing. They specialize in specific sections, At least to write a dissertation. They must know when ktoto chtoto done so judged on what has been done and the judge about his contemporaries in terms of their knowledge. So it was with the Impressionists and all the avant-garde, but "the vanguard of the 1960's, which is a political rather than artistic performensom, and was just blown art critic. The point here is rather watered orientation than in the art.
|
You're an artist, what do you you so disparagingly otnostites to your fellow guild? Concerning the "vanguard of the 1960's," which "is a political rather than artistic performensom" good to read the memories of people directly who have launched the art 60's, which you quoted in the vanguard of the call. I can tell you about E. Belutin, founder of the "new reality".
When do you think Khrushchev and his comrades from the ideological Dept. CC was (and) that art historians would agree with you that art is "inflated" the political significance of this artistic phenomenon of the art of "the Sixties"