Цитата:
Сообщение от dedulya37
I'm not otfutbolili them in court, and listened, and decided in their favor! That's what we in this shit is not enough.
|
Well, of course not enough. Sorry for îôôòîï, could not resist and did not paste here: last week was amended in the laws regarding the confiscation of property, which now relies more and over:
knowingly giving false testimony, expert opinion, incorrect translation during the preliminary investigation (Article . 307), attempts on the lives of judges, members of the investigation and prosecution, as well as their relatives (Article 295) and is a witness or victim from their stated above (Article 308), bribery, or coercion of witnesses to give false testimony or mistranslation ( Art. 309), forgery of signatures of voters (Part 2 of Art. 142), bribery of voters or members of election commissions (Part 2 of Art. 141)
Ah yes, one more important addition:
A warrant for the confiscation is not the decision of the court, and conviction. The concept of "compensation for damages" is replaced by "compensation for damages».
and do not forget: Basmanny Court is the Basmanny court in the world! ))))
Although the reason for rejection of the auction while in Canada rather dubious ...