Counterfeits exist in many areas of culture-in arhiologii, history, literature, PDI, and of course, in every.
Some argue about the interpolation in the annals, others about the authenticity of products with the stamps of Faberge, and others do not argue, and publish, for example, literary hoax, note Vyrubova or diary of Frida Kahlo. Until now, have argued for the authenticity of "Lay".
Were fake, and there will be. And in museum collections are known fakes, which atributsrovanny now works as a N /x with forged signatures and dates.
And how many on the market of genuine independent work, written in accordance with the aesthetic attitudes of the time, but not signed and has subsequently received the wrong signature? How? But after examination and faking. But some authors did not forged, the signature already struck other "craftsmen", they tried to deceive buyers. Yes, and often deceived. Clearly, one thing the picture n /x, and another with a signature. And with well-known.
We consider here are clear forgery, created it as such, from the beginning.
And not the part about copy. Copy will be a copy, right
Vivian, while it does not sign, a famous author, the work of this, of course, is not satisfied.
Do, do a lot. Look at the message
OlegTsi at the beginning of the topic. What to do? Laws impose? what? All already-fraud, etc.
But try to attract poddelschikov. You can not just-say, because: one draws, the second puts his signature, the third killed the making "Restoration of interference, the fourth provides a legend, Provenance, the fifth is a fake on the market, and only the sixth, seventh, eighth, etc. -- sell. Yes, and organizer of all this "project" exists ...
Added after 1 minutes
Цитата:
Сообщение от OlegTsi
Conclusion. Either Petrov had never seen these two works, or on the day of examination forgot my glasses ...
|
\r\nThere is a third option: put it to the head barrel.
"Pah-pah-pah ...
