embarrassing for me to say this on the SPECIAL site, but the painting as art, is not indicative of functions in relation to the daily life of the artist.
That is so conveniently explains the painting for children - the artist was, I saw flower, painted it, that's art.
Art is the creation of images using color and shape and all the problems of the artist lie in a purely formal area, where he solves them. And the evolution is there, in a purely formal space. T e artist can sit alone in a room day after day and in his paintings can be an evolution, although his life is absolutely nothing.
Picasso demand total seclusion for you Well you know - the children were not allowed to him. Van Gogh in Arles, made a most important discovery, although it is f-wilderness, away from the cultural life, not a single artist's isolation. Or do you think that a visit to a prostitute, encouraged him to solve the color problem?
Yes, I considered some of his letters, looking parallel to the work and realized that it was better just to watch the work, the texts do not explain, but on the contrary, distract.
|