In the examination of the Belarusian museum stated that the work submitted was compared with the unchallenged, reference works of the artist. I am surprised that work with apple trees (in the opinion of experts) is close to the benchmark. Under no circumstances I can not agree with that, the work of surprising his carelessness and inaccuracy. Manner B.-B. with the times are changing, but not in the direction of rudeness and carelessness. Rather, his work became sketchy and schematic way, the manner of 30-ies. becomes more pronounced and recognizable. A certain similarity of course is, therefore, assume that this work B.-B. can (with a grain of salt). I say this because, having personally restored about a dozen of his things and seen them a lot of (but similar to this have not seen any). Even small things he masterfully executed (example: a year ago in Gelos, with the barn and the river). In the Belarusian museum has got a huge amount of work B.-B. (over 800) of the "Seagull", among them were probably the work of his students, epigones and former under his influence artists. That's probably with them and compared the experts that work. By the way, working with the Lake of the Stavropol Museum is, to say the least (that-be not to offend anyone), questionable.
|