Quote:
Originally Posted by LCR
Kiefer like Chelishchev?
In my opinion, not at all - nor late nor early on.
On the other hand, no matter how pleasant to me to see that some - not too big - part of my stories is the forum response, the nature of this reaction is perfect, in my opinion, unsatisfactory.
Personally, I came to this forum because they thought that they say about art. If I was interested in a political plot structure, I would have enrolled in the appropriate forum.
There are too many talk about things neposredstvovannogo relationship to art is not available. At first, all this was happening in the arbor, and political subjects could not discover what I did. But now, I think there is almost no single branch, which would not be affected by this plague.
I do not know how things stand with you, from my training and placement of my messages requires some diligence and time, they are designed for people like me who are interested in art.
So, I suggest you stop in to discuss the branches devoted to the art of political, social and other matters.
|
LCR, as long as you do not give the possibility of doubt that your post is addressed to me, I consider it necessary to comment on it.
As you probably have already noticed, your fruitful efforts are not unnoticed by me. I'll tell you even more, your theme on the content of some of the most informative in this forum. This topic is no exception. Despite the fact that an artist I was not close, I was curious to know about his work. That's why I tried to express his attitude towards his writings in the hope that the conversation will continue to our mutual satisfaction. How easily can be calculated, I had written 5 posts, three of which just directly related to the topic under discussion. And you could not help but notice that I'd never join a political discussion, except when flagrantly distorted the history of my motherland. But that is typical, I never initiated discussions about politics. Usually, I react to especially egregious cases of distortion of historical truth. I think it is generally characteristic of people who think that, of course, are true artists. Therefore not surprising that often in the subjects of art appear politically motivated withdrawal. Art itself is inseparable from the social processes that occur around the artist, part of which he himself is.
The problem, I think, in another. And it is in fact,
as being such discussions in our forum. After all, in itself a comment, similar to that exhibited I (
http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showpo...11&postcount=9), does not pose a threat "zabaltyvaniya" and vulgarisation topic. Such threats are of a dilettante and indeed impudent remarks. The main producer of such "product" on the forum is
Cyril Syzransky (unfortunately, the posts confirming my words have been removed by the Administration). Provocation, rudeness, ignorance, have long been characterized his style of communication.
It would be far more useful, respected
LCR, if you, as a participant in the forum, which has undoubted authority, explained to Mr.
Cyril Syzran, how to behave in polite society. This would help address the problem of flooding and excessive aggressiveness on the forum. After all, this is what makes any discussion, in which there are political issues (as it inevitably will), in a quarrel.
Unpleasant and hopelessness of this enterprise are clear, so if you do not want to do this, you will find in me understanding. But I ask you to continue, do not blame the blame on a healthy and do not blame me for what I do not have any relation.
Sincerely, Tiutchev.