Цитата:
Сообщение от Veronic
works mainly with Western galleries,
|
Because of problems with counterfeit problem appeared Provenance. Not only the pictures of the past, which is natural, but also paintings by contemporary hudlzhnikov. And it is not yet known what form should be expressed. Understandable interests of buyers: they want to have on hand a document which somehow protects the object from further suspicions and questions. Moreover, the document they want, as it turned out, with a seal, "" certified "at least somebody. I understand that should count as a history painting and the history of sales. As the author can not be assured by a notary or even once nor its authorship or ownership of their works, nor the right to dispose of them at its discretion. This is spelled out in the Copyright Act. But the problem arose. I think that is enough if the author himself wrote provenance of its paintings, ie exhibitions and inclusion in catalogs, publications, etc. Pictures and representation in the Internet, may be something else. But gallery owner, or someone who takes them to the auction may already notarize that was precisely this list personally from the author. And this ksiva already can be transferred and further supplemented by further history. I mean, that provenance is required from a living author and should think of something ...