Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 12.11.2009, 20:46 Язык оригинала: Русский       #2
Старожил
 
Регистрация: 02.09.2008
Сообщений: 700
Спасибо: 222
Поблагодарили 484 раз(а) в 201 сообщениях
Репутация: 861
По умолчанию

A new modern laboratory with cutting-edge research methods, it is very good, but in this article, the author did not focus on the most important aspekt.K this laboratory has brains are necessary, EXPERIENCE and shaft (large quantity ekspertiruemyh pictures).
Speaking objectively, the examination in Ukraine there are no, or rather is, but it is at its lowest level.
In the summer of this year, I was offered very serious about painting by the Russian artist, first half of the 19 veka.Luchshie experts of Ukraine, the most titled, with a mass of scientific degrees and titles a month studying rabotu.Verdikt so-and-not the artist, expert opinion will not write, the master of shock very decent people, nothing to do with antiques imeet.V not personal conversation with the experts, their argument was simple, in X-rays to build the paint layer does not coincide with the reference works hudozhnika.Ya all listened and now kupil.Mne its confirmed first in Grabar, then in RM, and without doubt.
And now the most interesting, in a personal consultation with leading experts in these peer institutions, all experts in one voice said "The works of this artist in X-rays can not be read."



мистер-у вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 7 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо мистер-у за это полезное сообщение:
SAH (12.11.2009), Sandro (12.11.2009), Tana (15.11.2009), vyadem (12.11.2009), Вивьен (13.11.2009), Евгений (26.12.2010), Тютчев (12.11.2009)