Цитата:
Сообщение от DSF
There will be an opportunity to earn - well, no - nothing too terrible.
|
This is misleading, almost all the artists think about how to earn, how to feed the family (I'm working with them for 20 years), and now so bolee.Slova Renoir, Degas is just beautiful words, far from the truth.
Poverty is not mandatory for the success of the artist, rather the contrary.
Цитата:
Сообщение от dedulya37
"to lie under the State", but the collection will continue. Example - a collection of Rostropovich and Vishnevskaya.
|
Sasha did not understand your idea, Rostropovich and Vishnevskaya under the State did not lay down, just decided to sell the collection through the auction and all. (The fact that Usmanov bought the whole, and gave the State, Rast.i Vesh.zdes do with it).
Vishnevskaya do not care who buys it, the state, one person, sto.Ee interested only in price, price Usmanov it arranged.
Цитата:
Сообщение от dedulya37
And it is for the entire collection of the State to follow, unlike the disparate works.
|
Do not tell Sasha, "keep track" of 1925-1970, Russia echelons sold abroad paintings, collections of leading museums strany.I mind you, these collections are not state owned, 90%of all has been stolen from private collectors, their rodstvennikov.Tak that the state (especially Soviet), better be quiet.