IMHO, until the 20 th century artist, generally applied profession, was to paint the church, to paint a picture of the battle, portraits and so T e was a good artist, by definition successful. If it is bad, who would give him an order for a portrait? And since the end of the 19 th when the paintings began to be interested as a separate value and began to appear unsuccessful artists, but rarely. Cause-increased the lag time between the creation of the product and its consumption and life cycle of the author's sometimes lag that did not have time to meet.
T e, we all understand that if Malevich and Van Gogh lived a little longer, recognition and success they would also surely caught.
|