Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 18.10.2009, 15:05 Язык оригинала: Русский       #7
Гуру
 
Регистрация: 10.04.2009
Адрес: ישראל
Сообщений: 2,566
Спасибо: 6,355
Поблагодарили 2,524 раз(а) в 963 сообщениях
Репутация: 4255
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Konstantin Посмотреть сообщение
Does it make sense in such parallels?
Цитата:
Сообщение от Mark Посмотреть сообщение
A faithful son of his people, he monetise its closeness to the Savior, put it on the scales on the one hand - an emerging Christian culture, but on the other - 30 pieces of silver - an amount that allows time to buy a small plot of land in the vicinity Jerusalem.
In this "parallel" does not make sense. "The emerging Christian culture" - has come into being over a hundred years after Christ's death (and the consequent? Suicide of Judas), and only thanks to the work (in the literal sense) of the apostles Peter and Paul, who created Christianity as the religion of (part culture). The traitor Judas - Traitor to the point of view of the followers of Christ, ie his apostles. From the standpoint of the then authorities of Judea and its people, he was a loyal citizen and loyal.
Binding of Judah in the "Christian culture" far-fetched. Sleazebag, who laid the authorities suspect a philosopher, and received for his denunciation of the money - that's what Judas. Even the allusions to Christian culture and Christian religion did not yet exist. Christ is not intended to create a new religion. This is done through a hundred years after him. And much to the "establishment" culture started even later.



Jasmin вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 3 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо Jasmin за это полезное сообщение:
vall (18.10.2009), Кирилл Сызранский (18.10.2009), Синица (25.10.2009)