Цитата:
Сообщение от gans
On the night of 30 September in Kiev burned gallery Gudimova Street Voloshskaya.
September 25, 2009 in Gallery I through III of literary and artistic festival Kiev barricade held debate propaganda of homosexuality or promoting tolerance? The meeting discussed the ban by the Ministry of Culture public kinoprokata comedy "Bruno" Sacha Baron Cohen
|
Horror as devoured me, this theme!
It even wanted to write "УЖОС as devoured.
The question I have so originated - and why the art gallery discusses socio-journalistic questions?
Is "tolerance", "homosexuality" - a visual-aesthetic category? It seems that the art galleries (and artists) must deal with something like the latter.
Malevich invented Suprematism, Picasso invented cubism (both about homosexuality have been aware of, I think), and contemporary artists and gallery owners have decided to show how the men each other fry. Innovators.
Well, I understand, everyone loves movies.
Everybody wants to Borat to see.
And always on the big screen.
Because no TV does not give that play of colors, subtle camera work, veil there just this great work.
None would discuss "The Impact of Luchino Visconti in the earlier films Antonioni, for example, if we do not like about Malevich pereteret (excuse me, and pulls on boratovsko-Bratkowski lexicon, but what I'm good, still playing hard for a fall).
No, the artistic elite (I think ours, Russia, and Ukrainian here differ little) can not be without borates and killing the bill.
Elite - an elite art. And elitist entertainment, I have Nero, I am the Emperor.
As long as people think they are artistic elite, will serve the public yellowness (or blue?
) As contemporary art, there are still dozens of elites who find their elite action against such an elite art, and will benefit from this for a profit.
But artists, who for arson, too, was surprised. I thought the book burn-tapa stinks.
And the main thing for most is in the kicks - one gomov fotyat other lousy such intellectuals wet-PARTY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !