Цитата:
Сообщение от Wladzislaw
operator,
But any other person who has a 100 thousand U.S. dollars. and wishing to acquire the sculpture Archipenko, the road to Sotheby's, Christie's and the like, where there will be sculptures, documents, and not metal and paper.
|
Replete with examples where the above-mentioned offices for sale and exhibit of work without a stock heirs of the author! And the price accordingly differ from this. As I understand from the forum - all about archival records in the cast up and the price of trade in the heirs of the author. Until 1964, the work of certified fund Archipenko - hundreds of thousands - up to 1964 is not confirmed by Fund - dozens - and all that is molded after the death of the author - bullshit is nothing more than the cost of bronze and not worth it.
The question is confirmed by those of Fund A or not - are they the money that the act of assessment or an order of magnitude less!? One way to pay the fund money and not the fact that they will confirm! So who is curious what would be risking 3 thousand!?
Way and on the photo are their archives check can and assessment do?
[color="# 666686"]Added after 8 minutes[/color]
[QUOTE=OlegTsi;629086]
Цитата:
Сообщение от operator
Why I asked at the expense of the bottom of the sculpture? If there is matter, it can undermine and see the attachment to the base of the sculpture - a bolt or nut. Look and you will have an idea of when the sculpture was made.
|
(almost all) sculpture bolted bolts (about the nuts do not know - because that would screw the bolt through the base of a bronze need strong thread!
How are you on the studs and nuts define the time of creation? - Enlighten forumchan please!
then .. reason could be screwed a lot later than the work itself and even on the restoration to go too be! The only evidence - a chemical and physical analysis of the patina and most bronzes - it gives a clear answer about the time of creation!