Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 25.09.2008, 08:53 Язык оригинала: Русский       #17
Banned
 
Регистрация: 05.06.2008
Адрес: UKRAINE
Сообщений: 8,039
Спасибо: 5,979
Поблагодарили 7,017 раз(а) в 2,462 сообщениях
Репутация: 12461
Отправить сообщение для uriart с помощью Skype™
По умолчанию

I wanted to afford to buy after the auction a couple of her gouaches, Vasilyeva, but changed his mind.
I like to work with oil.
But for Kholodovskii can and to argue.
It does not agree that forgery.
The work was all research. Paint over time. Signed on raw.
And it is not blurred places. Old normal canvas.
Manner - there indentichnye work. And the last argument.
Who needed such a "major" artist to be counterfeit?
One would think that forged today. Agree. However, research results indicate the contrary.
So excuse me, my friend!
Explicitly hasty conclusions.



uriart вне форума   Ответить с цитированием