saw a lot of graffiti in various cities, but as a painting that activity can not be considered. Because of poor workmanship.
So yes-expression, urbanism, non-conformism, all this is and involves. But so constituted the human eye and brain, that if the paint dull white paint on canvas is a blundering, but if you create the same white color, having written his brush strokes of pink, blue, yellow, gray, is an art - a painting, the eye and the brain is interesting. So arranged the "white" portraits of Picasso, he has such a series.
The same with graffiti. Therefore gans-y, like the dilapidated graffiti appears texture and dull digital not like.
In this direction he went and Basquiat. I already wrote in relevant part, that Basquiat - is Rauschenberg, over which the balloon nabryzgany fellows, m e the richness of color and texture, which have acquired the abstract expressionists, he combined with expression and urbanism, youth graffiti - turned out well. The street is impossible to create is quite Îáüåìíûå time job and requires the mixing of colors, creating subtle nuances that, with balloons is problematic.
And regarding the terms-Street Art - is a broad term that includes street jugglers and playing music in the underpass. So, what we are talking, basically-graffiti. And, of course, street performances-type, cut a prepared home object and paste it into some sort of street busiest place is not graffiti. Graffiti originally-mark territory and to require her artistry, well, I do not know ... The case of the drawing in Chernobyl is again a performance, because the image itself is not as important as context-where, how, the environment, subtext ...
|