Цитата:
Сообщение от Konstantin
Remember, under this sauce privatization takes place in the 90's.
|
Privatization was carried out when the word "market" had one meaning: Grandmother with dill and guests from the sunny Caucasus with tangerines, there was nothing else. Therefore, all rushed to snatch a piece of something, once the state says: Here, take, Zadar! Now this can not be: 1. There is an art market, 2. one owes nothing for nothing will not give, 3. object in question, it is defined.
Wrote itself a contradiction: if the museums do not know what and in what corner they had lying around, then organize a transparent procedure for the sale would not be possible, as much burden and control to install - simply fantastic. Although it would seem: to take a separate museum, conduct an audit of funds, identify what can be sold into private hands with the encumbrances (that is, if you do not sell, then soon to write off will be nothing), to conduct the auction, the money spent on repairs and protection of the same museum , oblige buyers restored and exhibited in the same museum.
Sounds logical, but how naive!