nts17, Yesterday I was on the occasion of the Picture Gallery of Old Masters in Berlin. There I saw a picture of Sebastiano del Piombo, Number 4 of my message. Then looking on the internet found the analogue of your work. In this lively work Sebastiano del Piombo as close to his teacher, Raphael (which hung in the adjoining room) as the heavens and the earth. Rummaging in the Internet found information that the work attributed to Sebastiano del Piombo, including to and from for a model. And for me, if he was a pupil of Raphael, not he. In general, dark forest.
Believe me, your research in order to sell expensive little of lead.
Old Masters, is an information swamp without a bottom.
The lion's share of all the works of old masters are not signed.
The lion's share biographical information sucked out of the finger.
Ownership of an artist to a particular school, usually assumed by art critics on the basis of similarities in technology, the plot of models, etc. analysis of birth and death dates and places of residence.
On one of Rubens, which is considered a real Rubens, a dozen works, which are not inferior quality but are attributed to the maestro. Why so, long story. Thus Rubens himself would cost $ 3,000,000 and attributed only $ 30,000, and all of the old and all in all. This Sebastiano del Piombo far from Rubens, and you only have a copy of the 19 th century.
|