Цитата:
Сообщение от Vladimir
The precipitate remained.
|
Exactly sediment. Whether he stole it, or whether he had.
If you want to understand the phenomenon, more or less closer to the truth, can not use the version of only one of the parties. One should not lose sight of the context of time and personal relationships
It was the Cold War. Some voluntarily, others involuntarily became soldiers of the ideological front. And in war as in war, their actions geroiziruyutsya, and the actions of the enemy okarikaturivayutsya.
Is the threat to the regime those artists who have become spokespersons for the twelve exhibitors Bulldozer exhibition? Of course not! Even with the hint of a threat to the state would be erased them in powder. What made it decisively and with regard to those dissenters who were perceived as ideological enemies.
Meanwhile, it condoned mischief of these artists. They could write what they wanted and were free to sell their work, and those who were connected with dipartom, living in a material sense, not worse, if not better than the official artists.
SINYAVSKY said that he had with the Soviet authorities purely stylistic differences. At the informal leader of the unofficial artists Oscar Rabin did not even have any.
Look at his paintings of those years. With a picturesque point of view - it is quite ordinary MOSH, closer to its left wing. No subversive innovation. For others it will be more abruptly. Take the same artists "severe style". They then, as time and a little afraid of little gifts of nomenclature CX.
State did not suit the plot O. Rabin. They contradicted the ideological doctrine, under which the Soviet people - a nation of historical optimism. Indeed, not much optimism in the works of Oscar Yakovlevich not place them in the exhibition spaces, the owner of that State.
And in this - opportunities to exhibit in a public exhibition spaces, the meaning was ostensibly a demonstration to Belyaev wasteland.
All participants were aware of the action of the realities of the time and that a similar demonstration at the desired state is not obtained, but also realized that the hard consequences will not come. In such a case from their side it was a well-planned provocation, where the most important role was assigned to the Western press. Only V. Vorobiev led to this event 10 Western photojournalists. What he wanted, and that, eventually, got as a result of this action - the question still open.
History is still awaiting study behind the scenes of many events of our recent past, including Bulldozer and performance, and subsequent exhibitions in VDNH, and the creation of Section at the city committee schedules, and funding of the magazine "AZ", and Moscow Sotheby's 1988, and the country has auctions abroad, organized Drobitsky. So who, where, when and with what chemical to another deal.
As the stories of these "mustard gas", it is just one example of when you should take into account the human qualities of the characters. You had to know the peculiar character and temperament of the Jura hot, it giperkofliktnost and phenomenal ability to amass enemies, which in the end, he fell out with everyone, including friends, gallery owners, they were engaged, well-wishers and admirers of his rare creativity.
And now imagine that not very competent police officer placed to look after foreigners in contact with the weird artist, what is in those times of the Cold War was quite a common practice not only for us but on the other side of the Atlantic (though perhaps not so clumsy).
Well, Jura, get caught him by the policeman's hot hand could he not only skazanut something such things, but zvezdanut in the forehead.
A Western voices and newspapers immediately told to the world that the Soviet Union for the progressive non-conformist art were put on 15 days of a young talented artist.
In general, it is clear what I mean. Not so long ago had occasion to hear from V. Yankylevsky: "When will this documentary book about us? So far, no true ".
Then, when will the era of imposture, holuystva and boorishness. While there are interested in the distortion of history and those who can influence this process, this book will not.