Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 17.09.2009, 14:42 Язык оригинала: Русский       #9
Местный
 
Регистрация: 14.06.2009
Сообщений: 184
Спасибо: 193
Поблагодарили 660 раз(а) в 131 сообщениях
Репутация: 1164
По умолчанию

If 100%trust the pictures, there are some nit-picking.

Judging by the frame work of a large size. Very strange why poorly painted parts and no glaze.
Many serious hits in color (green trees, shrubs, grasses, bright red shade on the cottages, roosters, red kerchiefs)
Not bear accents. Total disregard for the foreground.
For this reason, there is a sense - work recently wrote in a short time and not finished. Either the work went to the hands of poor restorer.
Most embarrassing is very bright, flat color and a few padded letter.

Do not rule out that good work could ditch a bad picture and a bad color correction.
Recommendations of the photographer:
Photographing need without flash with the scale.
Photographing need a camera that will not distort color. For this reason, most "soap-boxes" categorically not suitable for photographing paintings.
Perhaps a good photo put everything in its place ...



v_r вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 5 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо v_r за это полезное сообщение:
Tana (17.09.2009), Вивьен (17.09.2009), Кирилл Сызранский (17.09.2009), олег назаров (17.09.2009), раскатов (17.09.2009)