Pictorial techniques chosen by the artist in accordance with the objectives which it sets itself, or in a match that dictate these tasks. In other words, selectable by the artist technique causes the final result and was originally motivated by the artist, and can not be only good packaging for the product or marketing ploy of the artist. It's strange, when the artist complicates what can be done easily, ie not understand why pictures, then process the image in Photoshop, and then transfer it to the canvas with oil. Does not it easier and more honest it would be to print one image size you want (and do many other artists). And then get some kind of falsification of the creative process.
This applies not only to Faibisovich, but also to many other artists. I even dare say that this problem is the fine art of our days. And the problem is that the emergence of a large number of technical features to the "artists" just for profanirovaniya creative process.
|