[Тютчев]

Grigory Revzin, editor in chief of the architectural magazine "Draft classic»:

"The general plan within the meaning of - a plan for city development. For any of need resources, people and capital. The paradox of the General Plan in that the people for its development is entirely unnecessary. The citizens expect from the plan of dirty tricks, and the authorities - cavil offended by Muscovites. It's an amazing strategy: imagine that you bring your team business plan, and the team expects from you only filth - so it is impossible to develop.

The main idea of the new plan is that the allocated zone of the reorganization and stabilization zone. Stabilization - within the Boulevard Ring, parks and areas around the monuments. This means that 80%of the city may do anything. And what exactly you want the current government is not clear. Dividing the city into zones of reorganization and stabilization - is a division of zemshchina and oprichnina. The first can live, how they lived, and the second we will do what we want. This feudal principle. For power in the city there is another valuable resource - land. And one problem: there are people. Now, if they were not, then absolutely it would be good: and sell can be expensive, and bear without looking. All the laws of the land law is based on the concept of ownership. In Moscow, there is no property, there is a lease. If some people want to build a house, then he must make the draft, according to which can receive from the government land on lease, and in return he must render service. And if he has done this service, sold the land to the new owner, then he can not now so easily start construction. No, he should prepare a new project documentation, get a new government decree, and render again.

In comparison with the Soviet system, it is a sharp reduction to the most savage: the feudal lords are great ability to manipulate people, but people can not do anything. And though the Soviet system differed rare exotic, it nevertheless supported some of the values inherited from the previous state. These values place is not found. Here's a monument. This value. But whose? Who should pay for it, who gets the income? As part of the feudal system of such entity no. Monument - a kind of public good, greatly hinders feudal administration: Moscow government, prefecture, city administration. There is a contradiction between the no man's land value and property interests. Three years ago, with me by e-mail has contacted a man under the pseudonym of Man without a tie. He wished to remain anonymous, wrote the text, which had a detailed list of what it costs the harmonization of design documentation of the building in all instances. Since the material came a strange story: when it was published in my magazine project classics ", I thought it was a bomb. Kuzmin, Moscow's chief architect for the publication I was scolded, and then all the architects were familiar to me to say that city planning officials that material otkserokopirovali, laid on the table and are guided by these in the text of the money as seed price list. I thought , the publication will blow up the system from within, and she had stabilized her. By the beginning of the crisis in the three years outlined in the figures - and you can easily find them, by driving in the search box the words "A man without a tie" - grew by 3-4 times.



Volhonka, 13
Was: XIX century mansion.
So: Gallery Ilya Glazunov