Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 10.09.2009, 14:12 Язык оригинала: Русский       #3
Местный
 
Регистрация: 24.09.2008
Сообщений: 180
Спасибо: 47
Поблагодарили 155 раз(а) в 77 сообщениях
Репутация: 161
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Konstantin Посмотреть сообщение
This is why here?
Do it (politics) in the door, she at the window.
No need to embed the theme of the art of politics. This is the arbor.
This, as you see talked about why all the germs of other areas were crushed and mariginalizovany and why art historical development proceeded in this way, (a sad result is that we have today in most museums and galleries). The reason was political, and the topic of whether the policy was affected. Contemporary art, crushed every living thing, it is politically-engaged art as well as he was not objective of Neo-Classicism in the 3-Sots.Realizm Reich and the Soviet Union. It is proven (some sources I cited).

[color="# 666686"]Added a 47 seconds[/color]
Цитата:
Сообщение от fross Посмотреть сообщение
All you kindly laid out the picture no more than a fantasy, to attract them some sort of spirituality or to more specific knowledge is like trying to make sense of bezsmyslitse. And much potivopostavlyat their kontemporari altogether pointless
For postmodernists, and very religious - no more than "fantasy". Attract to him some kind of spirituality "is like trying to make sense of bezsmyslitse."



appolinary вне форума