[Тютчев]

Сообщение от Meister

It is interesting how the cost of digital art? It's such a thing, which is easily repeated, ie copied. Here, for example, video art, Matthew Barney's "Cremaster Cycle", sold for 350 thousand dollars at Christie in 1990. I understand that the buyer gets the original film to the byline, but if you vobete in Google "cremaster, download", it will be easy to download the same movie torrent absolutely free. So what if the value of the film and how to evaluate the video art?

   Meister, a good question? But I do not know the answer. This seemed to me an interesting topic for discussion here I am, and laid out this story on the forum. Sam want to know more about it. Because many do not understand. I am also not clear as to maintain ownership of works of art created using video, photo, computer technology. I would like this to understand.

  Also interested in everything new happening in this area.

[color="# 666686"]Posted 6 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от fross

In ART Auction recently had an interesting article about the museum Stoschek. It is interesting now to see, and it would be good with Munch, it is perfectly explains everything.

I'd love to!

[color="# 666686"]Added in 23 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Chernomashentsev Vladimir

Where did this term?
  But why write?
Perhaps better to say, digital design, digital collage, computer installation?
Bee Flowers - epigone?

Vladimir, I do not know myself I want to understand all this.