[LCR]

Сообщение от Vladimir

Here is what proital on our site: http://artinvestment.ru/news/artnews...temporary.html

Quote:

"I had no idea that people have so much free money, it was fine. And it is wonderful that rich people have decided that money is invested in art. By the way, a quarter of all buyers were from Russia ", - confessed Sir Paltimor.

The problem of all is, my dear Volodya, that for every citation, there is always a counter-quote, here's to date:

Сообщение от Eugene

Democracy plutocrats
  Matthew Bown

But I do not think that on that evening in the auction was attended by many British collectors. The target audience for Sotheby's now are not residents of the West, suffered from a falling dollar and the collapse of financial institutions: they seek out new rich from Russia, China and India, whose state put together, thanks to high commodity prices, political connections and a rapidly growing economy. The work of Hirst primary resource of this cultural neo-colonialism: once, as I understand it, we offered savages beautiful beads in exchange for gold, but now we offer them no less beautiful butterflies Hirst's dead in exchange for nefterubli.

And here's another one from the text, which I now doperevela and placed on the forum:

Сообщение от LCR

To attract the very wealthy clientele, some artists have resorted to provocation with an industrial scale. Decaying cow's head (Hurst), Virgin, covered with excrement (Chris Ofili) can answer the expectations of one of the market segments: the segment, which lacked the hostility of the public, and its attendant scandal, hype around the product, as this segment is looking for primarily commercial. However, you can ask ourselves the question, whether this revolutionary art, funded and supported by state institutions and the financial giants of our time.

Caroline Bourgeois, lirektor Regional Center for Contemporary Art of the Paris region, says only that wealthy people "living in a culture of expediency. The form should be instantly recognizable »./.../

The higher the price, the less opportunity to expose the product to criticism. From the seller to the auctioneer, every inflate the price, to justify their work and their income. "In fact - ironically remarked one observer of the market - the buyer had bought did not work, but the price - the price, which was the value of the work. The only point is that sometimes the product of such a helpless thing that comes to the conclusion that the money in this environment have lost all value. "

But one way or another, and contemporary art is in great demand. It gives plausibility quickly fortunes. "This is an entrance fee to enter the circles, where the main criterion is the ability to pay - the entrance fee is very significant and therefore are mediatichesky interest, it is very important for new entrepreneurs growing countries" - comments Aude de Kerros.

Indeed, our Zhenya cyber findings confirm what is said in the quoted text you, just that they are written by people relatively impartial, unlike Sir Paltimora, exultation which is also understandable - after all, it is a seller successfully (or not so well - that we probably will not know) dream come your goods